The University Bookman


Winter 2016

The Start of the Division of Europe

book cover imageAfter Hitler: The Last Ten Days of World War II in Europe
by Michael Jones.
New American Library, 2015.
Hardcover, pp. 374, $28.

John Lukacs

On 30 April 1945, when Russian troops were but four hundred yards away from his underground headquarters, Adolf Hitler killed himself. The Second World War in Europe was over. But not quite. A week later German troops were fighting still. Some of their commanders did not sign their unconditional surrender for another two days. Some towns and villages were occupied by German troops for another ten days (in one instance more than three weeks after Hitler’s suicide.) A German government, appointed by him a few days before his death, was still in existence. Nothing like this happened after Napoleon’s fall in France in 1815. His cult and prestige went on and on in France for another fifty-five years. In Germany Hitler’s cult and prestige did not last. This in itself was a remarkable reversal, a change in public opinion and in the popular sentiments of an entire people.

Not many historians have dealt with what happened in Germany during the three weeks following Hitler’s death. This book tells us much about that time; it includes passages from letters and memoirs. It also suggests that the first symptoms of the cold war between Soviet Russia and the Western Allies (most particularly between Churchill and Stalin) were already discernible then. Jones’s prose depends sometimes on clichés. His summary of the entire war is expressed in this dedication: “To those–from East to West—who fought to rid Europe of fascism.” Fascism was a particular and short-lived Italian (more precisely, Mussolinian) phenomenon which had little in common with Hitler’s National Socialism. And: did Stalin really fight this war to rid Europe of “fascism”? Arguable at best.

Still in spite of these shortcomings the details of this book tell us much. Above all the Germans—the people as well as their armies—were convinced that their continued struggle against the Russians was unavoidable, while their struggle against the British and the Americans was not. Their reasons for this amounted to more than their belief in Hitler’s propaganda. The reports and the evidences of the barbarous and inhuman behavior of the Russian soldiers in Germany were more than sufficient for them to think so. Added to (or, more accurately, beneath and above) that was their conviction, not only that the Americans and the British would treat them better than the Russians but also the hope that sooner or later the Americans and the British would confront the Russians, a situation from which Germany could eventually profit. Throughout the weeks after Hitler’s death pronouncements of many of the remnant German generals ceaselessly declared that fighting “Bolshevism” was the duty, the task of German soldiers till the very end.

After Hitler’s death and before most of the surrenders of German forces to the Allies took place, there still a big swath of territory across the middle of Europe and Germany, peopled by German armies of various kinds, not yet overrun by their enemies. During the next three weeks these forces melted away, and the division of half of Europe between Russia and the West was nearly complete. And it was this division of Europe, not the spectre or danger of international Communism, which were both the sources and the essence of the coming cold war. Its main lines had been limned in February 1945 at Yalta, between Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt. They agreed on the division of Germany and Austria along zonal borders and on much of Eastern Europe going under Russian rule. What was unclear was what Russian rule would mean. Would it mean a Russian sphere of interest or total subservience to Russia? Soon Stalin’s preference was clear. Whatever his armies occupied was definitely and utterly his.

Churchill foresaw this—Roosevelt did not. This is why Churchill, in late April 1945, ordered Field Marshal Montgomery to race across the northern neck of Germany, notwithstanding the Yalta zoning, precluding Russian troops from entering Denmark. That is why General Eisenhower, the supreme commander of the Allied armies in Western Europe, ordered the American army to stop at the river Elbe, allowing the Russians to go into Berlin. That was why in the first days of May he ordered Americans to halt at the western frontier of Czechoslovakia, a country tacitly allotted to Russia. The advance of the western armies had been rapid enough so that they could have reached Berlin (or Prague) before the Russians. Eisenhower did not want that. Like Roosevelt he preferred to avoid any kind of trouble with Stalin. Churchill was already profoundly disturbed by Stalin’s moves in Poland, showing that he more and more obviously wanted to secure the all-out subservience of that great land (and of its brave army) to Russia.

So most of Europe (and Germany, and Berlin) were divided. This lasted for forty-five years. The subtitle of Jones’s valuable book reads: “The last days of World War II in Europe.” It was that—but, perhaps even more, it was the start of the division of Europe.  

John Lukacs is one of the nation’s preeminent historians. He is a long-time contributor for the Bookman.

Posted: January 17, 2016

Did you see this one? book cover

Wilmer Mills: The Poet as Maker
Steven Knepper
Spring 2017

Real progress consists in the movement of mankind toward the understanding of norms, and toward conformity to norms. Real decadence consists in the movement of mankind away from the understanding of norms, and away from obedience to norms.

Russell Kirk, Enemies of the Permanent Things, 1969


Subscribe & Follow


More from the Bookman!

book cover book cover book cover

Remember the Walking Dead
Timothy D. Lusch

Untethered Revolution
Scott Beauchamp

Literature as Counterculture
Allen Mendenhall

The Enigma of the Black Republican
Kareim Oliphant

One Hundred Years of Communism
Francis P. Sempa

The Ambitious Intellectual
Ann-Michele Sproviero

book cover book cover book cover

Bookman Contributors Elsewhere

John Lukacs —the great contemporary historian has pieces in both Chronicles (on being surrounded by books) and First Things (on a displaced pianist).

Joseph Bottom on fraud, American-style.

Andrew Bacevich on the end of endism.

Helen Andrews on the moon landing and the 1970s. Helen (a 2017 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow) wrote one of our most popular pieces, a consideration of the anti-suffragettes.


We are pleased to announce the release of The University Bookman on Edmund Burke, now available for Kindle. Collecting 21 reviews, essays, and interviews from the Bookman on the life and thought of Edmund Burke, this book is only $2.99, and purchases support our ongoing work to provide an imaginative defense of the Permanent Things. (3 Mar 2015)

Other Sites of Interest

Publisher Sites


Copyright © 2007–2017 The Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal